hypothesis-four
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | |||
| hypothesis-four [2024/05/07 13:13] – brian.m | hypothesis-four [2024/05/08 14:48] (current) – brian.m | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==== HYPOTHESIS FOUR: THE NEUROLOGICAL MODEL FOR BICAMERAL MENTALITY ==== | ==== HYPOTHESIS FOUR: THE NEUROLOGICAL MODEL FOR BICAMERAL MENTALITY ==== | ||
| - | **Explanation** | + | **Theoretical Claim** |
| Jaynes contended that the two-chambered mentality lateralized language so that what conscious people call volition took the form of hallucinatory “voices of the gods” (right hemisphere) who commanded the human “listener” (left hemisphere). So far a number of brain imaging studies have confirmed Jaynes’s arguments. | Jaynes contended that the two-chambered mentality lateralized language so that what conscious people call volition took the form of hallucinatory “voices of the gods” (right hemisphere) who commanded the human “listener” (left hemisphere). So far a number of brain imaging studies have confirmed Jaynes’s arguments. | ||
| - | **Evidence** | + | **Supporting |
| //The Neurological Basics of Speech// | //The Neurological Basics of Speech// | ||
hypothesis-four.1715105591.txt.gz · Last modified: 2024/05/07 13:13 by brian.m